[2602.11988] Evaluating AGENTS.md: Are Repository-Level Context Files Helpful for Coding Agents?

March 9, 2026

Text titled "Evaluating AGENTS.md" with authors listed and a paragraph discussing repository-level context files for codin...

Abstract:A widespread practice in software development is to tailor coding agents to repositories using context files, such as this http URL, by either manually or automatically generating them. Although this practice is strongly encouraged by agent developers, there is currently no rigorous investigation into whether such context files are actually effective for real-world tasks. In this work, we study this question and evaluate coding agents’ task completion performance in two complementary settings: established SWE-bench tasks from popular repositories, with LLM-generated context files following agent-developer recommendations, and a novel collection of issues from repositories containing developer-committed context files.

Across multiple coding agents and LLMs, we find that context files tend to reduce task success rates compared to providing no repository context, while also increasing inference cost by over 20%. Behaviorally, both LLM-generated and developer-provided context files encourage broader exploration (e.g., more thorough testing and file traversal), and coding agents tend to respect their instructions. Ultimately, we conclude that unnecessary requirements from context files make tasks harder, and human-written context files should describe only minimal requirements.

Source

These recent counterintuitive results might give us reason to rethink a very common pattern with agentic coding, which is to provide, via skills and agents, markdown files a whole lot of contexts for any project. The findings here are that this may actually degrade performance.